Supreme Court, February 2006
"Rejecting all contentions, the [Supreme Court] Bench ruled: 'There does not exist any legal concept which confers a legal right upon an encroacher to be rehabilitated."
"The court said the demand for rehabilitation would not gain any legal ground, even if a government had promised resettlement to encroachers on public land.
"The rehabilitation of the guallas (milkmen) of Bhubaneshwar [Orissa] had been engaging attention of the Orissa Government since 1987 and it had gone to the extent of initiating the process of identifying land for the purpose."
From The Times of India, Thursday, February 9, 2006
"The court said the demand for rehabilitation would not gain any legal ground, even if a government had promised resettlement to encroachers on public land.
"The rehabilitation of the guallas (milkmen) of Bhubaneshwar [Orissa] had been engaging attention of the Orissa Government since 1987 and it had gone to the extent of initiating the process of identifying land for the purpose."
From The Times of India, Thursday, February 9, 2006
comments
Lawrence Liang
@ 09.02.2006 12:50 CESTHi all
my colleague Clifton did a lot of work in the demoliyions in Bombay, and is continuing to work on infrastructure issues in bangalore, including a url hich might be useful for all
Lawrence
Lawrence Liang
@ 09.02.2006 13:01 CEST
sorry the last message didnt have the URL, so here it is
http://www.altlawforum.org/Resources/Cities%20as%20a%20Legal%20Arena/
sorry the last message didnt have the URL, so here it is
http://www.altlawforum.org/Resources/Cities%20as%20a%20Legal%20Arena/
bedo
@ 01.01.2007 18:32 CESTDear client!
First of all we express to you the gratitude for the trust rendered to the company.
add a comment
The Trackback URL to this comment is:
http://nangla.freeflux.net/blog/plugin=trackback(64).xml
This blog is gravatar enabled.
Your email adress will never be published.
Comment spam will be deleted!